Why hasn’t the US Government launched a full-scale investigation into the suspicious deaths of Boeing whistleblowers? 🤔 #BoeingWhistleblower #USGovernment #Investigation #SuspiciousDeaths
The Issue:
Are you wondering why the deaths of Boeing whistleblowers have not sparked a comprehensive investigation by the US Government?
Lack of Action:
It’s puzzling why these deaths haven’t raised alarms or prompted thorough scrutiny from authorities.
Unanswered Questions:
What is preventing the US Government from delving deeper into these suspicious incidents? Is there a hidden agenda at play?
Your Voice Matters:
Join the conversation and demand accountability for these whistleblower deaths. Let your voice be heard and push for transparency in corporate practices.
Remember, in a world where transparency is crucial, it’s essential to ask questions and demand answers. Stay informed, stay curious, and let’s work together for a better, more accountable society. #Transparency #DemandAccountability #StayCurious
no evidence of foul play, the last guy died from an apparent infection. assassinating a whistleblower after they blew the whistle also poses logical issues
The second one is absolutely accidental
> There’s no chance those two deaths were accidental
Really? No chance at all? Two completely unrelated people months apart, with only a faint connection between them?
it will take some time for the full autopsy to come back .. real investigations take time.
uh, because it was an accidental death?
I really doubt Boeing gave him MRSA.
Why do you think there’s no investigation? Not everything is made public.
Investigations are rarely announced.
“There’s no chance those two deaths were accidental.” Really? How do you know that? Do you know what a coincidence is?
Correlation doesn’t equal causation.
Sometimes people die from pneumonia.
probably because there is nothing to it and you’ve been watching too many conspiracies on tik tok
The second fellow had pneumonia on top of a mrsa infection, his doctors suggested surgery of which he declined. I struggle with seeing where “assassination” would be at work here. He turned down a surgery that could have saved his life.
There’s no chance those two deaths were accidental?correlation is not causation. Critical thinking is important. One is suspicious, the other is not. Saying there’s “no chance” it’s accidental is just juvenile m
Whole lot easier ways of killing a guy then giving him the flu, hoping it develops into pneumonia on the chance it may need intubation and itll maybe give him MRSA
If these were the only two whistleblowers, it would look mighty suspicious. As there are many, many more, it is pretty clear that this is just a coincidence.
There’s no reason to think yet that there isn’t an investigation underway
You people watch waaaay too many crime dramas. Why would they risk murdering witnesses well after they’ve already given their depositions? It just doesn’t actually make any sense when you think about it for like five seconds.
We know one wasn’t accidental, at least as far as has been reported, it was a suicide. You have no idea what the other one was. You can’t say it was malicious, you have no evidence, you’re just making an assumption based on the circumstances.
Probability dictates that things we perceive as being highly unlikely happen regularly. You may think it’s suspicious, but that’s just your opinion and nothing else.
There’s nothing to make a deal out of until investigations are conducted. We don’t jump to conclusions, we examine the facts.
Because saying “there’s no chance those two deaths were accidental” doesn’t make it so.
Is MRSA even a thing you can kill someone with? My understanding is that it’s a very opportunistic infection that you can’t just put in someone’s drink.
How do you know it hasn’t? I’m guessing you’d be the very last person to know.
Because it’s an idea born out of provocative headlines intentionally omitting **essential** context. What do I mean?
John Barnetts testimony to Congress had concluded in 2019 with the resulting FAA mandates implemented that same year at Boeings 787 facility. The “testimony” John was in the midst of *was an appeal for a previously rejected defamation lawsuit* against Boeing – which is notably, NOT whistleblowing. Not only had he already given his testimony the previous two days (and was only pending cross examination), but he hadn’t even suggested he had new information to reveal as he had he not worked for Boeing since 2017.
As for this individual, he was not a “Boeing whistleblower”. He was a **Spirit AeroSystems** whistleblower (a company that suppliers both Boeing and Airbus) and who **died from pneumonia compounded with MRSA he got while at the hospital** – not some strange mystery as some keep suggesting.
So if Boeing is killing past whistleblowers, and a guy working for a *supplier*.. and they are doing it to “scare” others.. it won’t effectively scare anyone in the industry because their deaths are so *clearly* not hit jobs. An ambiguous scare tactic that assassinated uninvolved people?
And they’d have to scare (or kill) 32 more of them.
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2024/4/19/boeing-subject-of-32-whistleblower-complaints-documents-reveal
Do you know it isn’t?
Your premise that there is “no chance” is false. Many things are possible, but it’s also likely that whistleblowers skew towards those with not much left to lose.
Why would the people funded by the military industrial complex investigate them?
Because it’s a stupid conspiracy theory. Both whistleblowers have told their stories over and over. No board of directors filled with multimillionaires is going to order a hit.
Let’s stop for a minute to think about that….
Because murder in the name of capital is very much acceptable to the US government…it’s kind of like their whole “thing”.
Because Boeing is honestly a state owned enterprise with the way it works even though it’s technically privately owned. Same for most other defense contractors like Raytheon, Lockheed, Northrop etc
Boeing has ties with the government. Military ties.
The company cannot be alllowed to fall.
In case you haven’t noticed, bumping people off in the u.s and to some extent the u.k, is a routine thing. They don’t want an investigation, they know exactly what happened and are keeping it quiet, Boeing will have paid handsomely for it.
Boeing whistleblowers, Jeffrey Epstein, JFK, Diana & 9/11 if your feeling particularly conspiratorial. It’s basically what happens when you turn the mob onto a protected elite member
Look up what Boeing provides the military.
That’s why they can kill all the whistleblowers they feel like, and it all gets swept under the rug.
The US government **needs** Boeing for the military, and a mountain of dead whistleblowers wouldn’t get in their way.
and people say USA isn’t corrupt lol. Joke country.
boeing is a contractor for various military outlets.
that’s exactly why.
Boeing is an important DARPA contractor. If Boeing suffers a hit, so does our defense system. The US government probably had something to do with it being that they literally have kill squads just sitting around playing Spades. Who is going to investigate the government? The government? We’ve already seen the results of that. Looking at you, Epstein.
Because Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS) is a division of The Boeing Company is based in Arlington, Virginia, near Washington, D.C. The division builds military airplanes, rotorcraft, and missiles, as well as space systems for both commercial and military customers, including satellites, spacecraft, and rockets.
If Boeing stops fixing making planes and all their plains are grounded globally due to a investigations what are we going to fly?
They did investigate but the investigators got suicided.
Honestly, do you want that job?