#ethicaltesting #animalrights #crueltyfree
Hey there, have you ever wondered why we still test on animals in this day and age? It’s a hot topic for debate and one that often raises strong emotions. But what if I told you there was a more, um, unconventional suggestion for who we should be testing on instead?
What if we tested on r4pists instead of innocent animals? After all, it’s not like they’re gonna say no, right? They clearly don’t know what consent means.
Testing on animals has long been a controversial issue, but what if we shifted the focus to those who have harmed others instead? It’s a thought-provoking idea that challenges traditional methods of testing. And who knows, maybe it could lead to groundbreaking discoveries while also bringing justice to those who have been wronged.
So, what do you think? Should we test on r4pists instead of animals? Let’s spark a conversation and see where it takes us. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below! 🐾💭🔬 #LetsTalk #JoinTheDiscussion
So real☺️
and pedos 🎀
and child abusers 🥰
And murderers, not like they can be mad about a person killing another person.
How do you know 100% that someone is a rapist?
Actually kind of a good idea, make all the useless people test subjects. It would have 100% accurate results and tax money wouldn’t have to be spent on people as useless as rapists and murderers.
Jokes aside, that’s an amazing idea lmao
I agree.
And pedos and zoos and rso’s and child moles.
I would be on board if there was a guaranteed way to know if someone actually did it. My brother in law was accused of rape and the only reason he got out of it was because they talked about him penetrating them when he’s trans and hasn’t had his bottom surgery
🥐🥐🥐
10000%
i’m stealing this idea.
Valid Opinion ngl
R4pe is a very easy to fabricate or accusable crime
We should keep the punishments, but not make them too cruel, in case of a falsely accused prisoner.
actually this is a great idea.
sure, believing certain crimes are awful enough to almost entirely revoke ones rights over is reasonable, *but*, allowing any governing body the authority to designate someone as essentially subhuman under the law is a slippery slope. prison labor in the US is a good example. you can get a job in prison, but [you’ll be underpaid, mistreated, and broadly dehumanized.](https://www.aclu.org/news/human-rights/captive-labor-exploitation-of-incarcerated-workers) but the *critical* issue with this is that [the justice system is not perfect, and in fact, frequently convicts the innocent.](https://www.georgiainnocenceproject.org/general/beneath-the-statistics-the-structural-and-systemic-causes-of-our-wrongful-conviction-problem/) these miscarriages of justice often disproportionately effect minorities, too, often through broader cultural perceptions, like the stereotyping of black men or trans women or gay men as predators. if you allow ***any*** group to be considered subhuman under the law, bigots will alter the legal definition of that group to include people they are trying to hurt.
I do genuinely hope that you read this, and are convinced, or at least convinced to think it over a bit more!
That’s a good idea
Ah yes, because pettiness usually works out well in societal settings.
there’s the problem of someone being innocent
they can’t say no anyway✨✨🎀🎀
false convinctions is all im going to say.
I agree 100%
I mean it should be tested on prisoners with higher sentences as of all i mean the only problem is we become irl scp foundation just without the cool monsters and only the testing of strange things on not good people
Yes exactlyyyy
there’s this thing called human rights where it would make you as bad as them to do that to them.
This will only prompt governments to broad the definition of r4ape
one of the worst ideas… you do know that there are rapists that are falsely accused? they should keep their punishments the way it is, but something cruel isn’t humane.
what if the guy’s falsely accused
This is so smart
Pedophiles, necrophiles, and zoophiles, too!
They’re all sub-insect filth anyway!
But only on people how did something just because you have the illness of liking kids you shouldn’t be punished