#Mythbusters #EthicsFree #MythBusting #UnethicalExperiments
🔍 Have you ever wondered what myths the Mythbusters team would bust if they threw out all ethics and morals? Imagine the possibilities they could explore without any restrictions! In this article, we’ll delve into some potential myths that the Mythbusters could tackle if they were to conduct their experiments without any ethical considerations. So, let’s dive into the world of unethical mythbusting and explore the uncharted territory.
## Unethical Mythbusting: Exploring New Horizons
### What If Ethics Were Out the Window?
The Mythbusters have always been known for their daring and often controversial experiments. But what if they were to push the boundaries even further and conduct experiments without any ethical considerations? While this may seem like a far-fetched scenario, it’s intriguing to think about the myths they could tackle if they were to throw caution to the wind.
### Myth #1: Testing Extreme Human Endurance
One of the most controversial myths that the Mythbusters could explore without ethical restraints is the limits of human endurance. They could conduct experiments pushing individuals to the absolute limit without any regard for their well-being. Some potential experiments could include:
– Testing how long a person can go without food, water, or sleep
– Pushing the boundaries of physical endurance in extreme environments
– Investigating the effects of extreme physical exertion on the human body
### Myth #2: Unethical Animal Testing
Without ethical considerations, the Mythbusters could delve into experiments involving animals that would be deemed unethical in any other circumstances. Some examples of these experiments could include:
– Testing the effects of extreme conditions on animals without any regard for their well-being
– Conducting experiments that involve potentially harmful or dangerous situations for animals
– Exploring myths that involve animal cruelty or mistreatment
### Myth #3: Experiments Involving Human Safety
The Mythbusters have always been cautious when it comes to conducting experiments that could pose a risk to human safety. However, without any ethical considerations, they could potentially explore myths that involve putting individuals in dangerous or life-threatening situations. Some examples of these myths could include:
– Testing the survivability of extreme accidents or disasters
– Conducting experiments involving extreme risk-taking behavior
– Investigating myths that involve potential harm to individuals without any regard for their safety
### Myth #4: Unrestricted Environmental Impact
Another area that the Mythbusters could explore without ethical considerations is the environmental impact of their experiments. They could potentially conduct experiments that result in significant harm to the environment or natural habitats, which would be unthinkable in any other context. Some potential myths they could tackle include:
– Investigating the impact of extreme pollution or environmental degradation
– Conducting experiments that result in significant harm to ecosystems or wildlife
– Testing the limits of environmental damage without any ethical constraints
## Conclusion
While the idea of the Mythbusters conducting experiments without any ethics or morals may seem far-fetched, it’s interesting to think about the potential myths they could bust if they were to throw caution to the wind. From pushing the limits of human endurance to conducting experiments that pose a risk to human safety and the environment, the possibilities are endless. However, it’s important to remember that ethics and morals should always guide scientific exploration and experimentation, and that the Mythbusters have always conducted their experiments with the utmost caution and respect for the well-being of all individuals and the environment. So, while the idea of unethical mythbusting may be intriguing, it’s essential to uphold ethical considerations in all scientific endeavors.
a person can go without water for….
“lets see if this chemical compound has an effect on the human fetus”
“What actually happens to a human body in a vacumn?”
How much can a Gorilla actually bench press?
That when pumped full of adrenaline a mother has the strength to lift a car to save her child’s life.
They could do a series testing the truth of racial stereotypes.
“Russian Sleep Experiment”
Might be the last myth they attempt.
More cushion, more pushin
First that comes to mind is the “Dog in Microwave” Myth that they ultimately decided not to go through with.
I’d love to see no ethics Mythbusters, can you regress a bird into a dinosaur. There’s a guy who knows how to do it, but due to scientific ethics, he has to destroy the embryos.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QVXdEOiCw8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QVXdEOiCw8)
I’d like to let them grow up and see if they can breed that way viably. THEN you destroy the entire family. Because we don’t need dinosaurs. It could be a week long special. 😎
Trolley problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem?wprov=sfla1
Good myth is that the human head can still hear and see for a few minutes before lights out. After being decapitated.
Raise a child from the moment of birth, alone, inside a room completely covered in computer screens. Robotic arms would cater to the child’s needs. Then, a completely made-up reality, scientific laws, human relationships, and imaginary beings can be shown and interesting psychological tests conducted, a bit like Truman Show.
There were a lot.
They specifically didn’t bust dowsing for water or similar because they didn’t want to bring somebody on the show just to humiliate them.
Similarly for faith healers, acupuncture, homeopathic medicine and the like.
Same experiments, but instead of Buster the crash test dummy, Adam just does the tests himself.
Is speaking a language important for brain development and advancing growth?
The answer is yes because you have the case of Genie, a kid in a locked room severely isolated from external stimuli. She’s still alive and watched from the medical community. Currently, the best example of delayed speech learning leads to delay in many aspects of a functioning adult.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genie_(feral_child)#:~:text=Genie%20(born%201957)%20is%20the,her%20in%20a%20locked%20room.
Do humans taste like chicken or pork?
How many 5 year olds could you kill with a bat before dying if they came at you in waves?
I mean they tested the water drop torture.
Do babies taste better than adult humans.
Redo the Stanford prison experiment to see if they get the same results
Next on MB, can a group of pigs eat a 230lb man and leaves no trace?
Pineapple juice
Can you really extract correct information through torture? And how can you determine if the information is the truth. Here’s how it would go:
Step 1: Kidnap a couple. Husband/wife, parent/child, whatever. Just make sure they love each other very much.
Step 2: Separate them. Adam tells one of them a code. Jamie does not know this code.
Step 3: Adam tells the one who knows the code that if he tells this code to anyone else, he will kill the other victim. Adam leaves.
Step 4: Jamie tortures the first victim to find out the code.
For this to work, the 1st victim cannot know Adam and Jamie know each other.
​
Now, if you’ll excuse me, it’s meatloaf night at Arkham Asylum so I should be getting back there.
Can you really fit two raccoons up a single butt?
If anyone could suck enough dick to get their stomach pumped because they swallowed too much cum. Growing up, I heard this rumour about Rod Stewart and Madonna.
Can your face really get stuck like that?
*Jamie hold up a bottle of superglue and some fish hooks*
“Let’s find out!”
Adam pointed out in one of his recent videos how they never tested what is the best silencer, and now I am curious on those, both manufactured and makeshift.
Making an explosive device using house hold items.
They actually did this one and Adam Savage said it worked so well that they couldn’t in good conscious air it.
No he didn’t say what the items were.
When I was a student teacher, Adam and Jamie were guest speakers at a science teacher conference I attended. They told the story of a myth that never aired, because it turned out to be less ethical than they originally predicted. They wanted to test the myth that sugary kids’ cereals were so unhealthy that the box it comes in has more nutritional value. So, they made the cereal boxes into pulp and formed them into pellets to feed to mice. Another group of mice got cereal to eat. The mice that were only given box pellets ended up eating each other.