#Stars #HydrogenProcessing #Astrophysics
🌟 Are Stars Inefficient at Processing Hydrogen? 🤔
When it comes to the process of hydrogen fusion in stars, there is a common misconception that stars are inefficient at processing hydrogen. However, the reality is far more complex and fascinating than that. In this article, we will delve into the intricate process of hydrogen fusion in stars and explore whether they are truly inefficient at using up their hydrogen.
Understanding the Process of Hydrogen Fusion
Before we can determine whether stars are inefficient at processing hydrogen, it’s crucial to have a clear understanding of the process of hydrogen fusion in stars. Here’s a brief overview:
1. The Birth of a Star
– Stars are born from vast clouds of gas and dust known as nebulae.
– Gravitational forces cause the nebula to collapse, leading to the formation of a protostar.
2. Nuclear Fusion
– As the protostar continues to collapse under the force of gravity, the temperature and pressure at its core increase.
– Once the core reaches temperatures of millions of degrees, nuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium begins.
3. Stellar Evolution
– Throughout their lifespan, stars go through different stages of evolution, depending on their mass.
– Eventually, stars exhaust their hydrogen fuel and may go on to fuse heavier elements, leading to the formation of elements such as carbon, oxygen, and iron.
Are Stars Inefficient at Processing Hydrogen?
Now that we have a basic understanding of the process of hydrogen fusion in stars, let’s address the question at hand: Are stars inefficient at processing hydrogen?
It’s important to note that the efficiency of hydrogen fusion in stars is not determined by whether they use up all their hydrogen before going supernova. Instead, it is influenced by various factors such as the star’s mass, temperature, and nuclear reactions taking place in its core.
Factors Affecting Hydrogen Fusion Efficiency
1. Mass of the Star
– The mass of a star plays a significant role in determining its efficiency at processing hydrogen.
– Higher-mass stars have higher core temperatures and pressure, leading to more efficient hydrogen fusion.
2. Core Temperature
– The core temperature of a star dictates the speed of nuclear reactions taking place.
– Stars with higher core temperatures experience faster and more efficient hydrogen fusion.
3. Nuclear Reactions
– The specific nuclear reactions occurring in a star’s core also affect its efficiency at processing hydrogen.
– These reactions are influenced by the temperature, pressure, and composition of the core.
Efficiency of Hydrogen Fusion in Different Types of Stars
1. Main Sequence Stars
– Main sequence stars, like our Sun, exhibit a balance between the forces of gravity pulling inward and nuclear fusion pushing outward.
– They are relatively efficient at processing hydrogen, maintaining a stable energy output for billions of years.
2. Massive Stars
– Massive stars, with significantly higher mass than the Sun, have shorter lifespans due to their more rapid consumption of hydrogen.
– Their higher mass and core temperature make them more efficient at processing hydrogen.
3. Red Giant Stars
– Red giant stars are formed when lower-mass stars begin to exhaust their hydrogen fuel and expand in size.
– They are less efficient at processing hydrogen compared to main sequence stars.
In conclusion, stars are not inherently inefficient at processing hydrogen. Instead, their efficiency is determined by a complex interplay of factors such as mass, core temperature, and nuclear reactions. By understanding these factors, we gain a deeper appreciation for the intricate process of hydrogen fusion in the cosmos. Stars continue to astound us with their ability to fuse elements and produce the building blocks of our universe, shaping the awe-inspiring celestial landscape that surrounds us. 💫
For further insights into the world of astrophysics and star formation, stay tuned for more engaging content on our website! And if you’re interested in diving deeper into the mysteries of the cosmos, be sure to check out our detailed articles on stellar evolution and the life cycles of stars. Keep exploring the wonders of the universe with us! 🔭
Keywords: hydrogen fusion in stars, efficiency of hydrogen processing, astrophysics, nuclear fusion, star formation, main sequence stars, massive stars, red giant stars, stellar evolution, celestial landscape.
Like no. They are they most efficient transfer of energy-matter. Period.
​
As for the ‘H’ question. It is primary; the most ancient. After the oblique period it formed so the water you drink is, in fact, 13.7B years old (give or take some M years) .
​
It will all be used eventually because stars will reach the point of unviability.
​
As for stars going supernova? Only when iron is reached at the end of the H process does that happen…more energy required than created to fuse such, in a nutshell equals boom.
​
E=mc².
​
Love the question.
Efficiency isn’t the right word for it, but the reaction does go extremely slowly. Most fusion takes place in and around the core, averaged over the entire sun the power output per volume is comparable to a compost heap. The sun is just really really big so the total power is very high.
Someone else might come in an answer this question better than I can, but I think for the most parts stars are very good at finding the perfect “sweet spot” for fusion. Not too slow, not too fast.
When Hydrogen fuses you get an explosion of energy and plasma- this spreads out. But then you have the mass and gravity of the star- this pulls everything in.
If a star fuses too much Hydrogen it explodes out more, gets bigger, which causes it to cool more and fuse less hydrogen and then start to shrink.
If the star fuses not enough Hydrogen it shrinks which cause an increase of pressure so the star fuses more hydrogen and gets bigger.
This causes the star to be in near perfect equilibrium. Not fusing too fast and not fusing too slow. This stability along with the massive abundance of hydrogen is what causes them to live for so long.
Sort of.
stars like our sun burn for 10 billion years. During that time they will fuse a good percentage of their hydrogen. Something like 40% if I recall correctly.
The universe is ~14 billion years old. Stars the size of our sun haven’t had a full second generation yet.
More massive stars burn something like 15%. They last ~100 million years. Many more generations of these stars since the Big Bang. But they don’t form in as great a number as smaller stars either.
And there is a LOT of hydrogen that isn’t in stars too, just wandering around that hasn’t been formed into stars yet. Like nearly all hydrogen hasn’t even formed a single star yet.
The bigger a star is, the more inefficient at burning its hydrogen it becomes because it will usually only burn the hydrogen deeper in its core. The smallest stars such as red dwarves have convection currents that evenly mix all of its hydrogen allowing it to burn most of it up.
In terms of how much is burnt before death, only red dwarf stars are capable of burning their entire starting stock of hydrogen. The reason for this is that theyre fully convective, with material from the surface and core freely mixing as the star burns. Combined with their low fusion rate, a red dwarf will outlast all other stars by orders of magnitude.
For stars like our sun, they are **not** fully convective. Outside our suns core there is a region called the radiative zone, and the core itself where fusion occurs is not convective. All of the mass in the radiative zone and above is unavailable to the core for fusion, so when the core burns out, any further hydrogen fusion only occurs at the base of the radiative zone in what is known as shell burning. Meanwhile the helium rich core is contracting and heating up. Eventually conditions are right for helium fusion to begin, and core burning resumes, forming carbon.
For high mass stars, their cores burn ferociously hot, enough that their mantles and surface zones are fully convective. This method is an excellent mover of heat, and when it reaches the surface it is vigorous in its escape, driving a powerful stellar wind. This stellar wind blows a significant portion of the stars mass away, and one of the ways we know a specific star has blown its hydrogen away to expose the core is by looking at the spectra these particular stars produce; theyre almost always very depleted in hydrogen lines and enriched in heavier elements. The most violent of these stars are known as Wolf-Rayet stars.
For supermassive stars, they burn so violently fast most of their output is in ultraviolet radiation, which rapidly drives off the hydrogen envelope. These stars however never fully shed it all because their cores destabilize and explode before they can. Pair-production is one of the methods this happens, wherein the gamma rays in the core are so energetic they spontaneously form electron-positron pairs instead of being absorbed and reradiated to support the mass of the star. This causes a positive feedback loop that results in a supernova. Another method is photodisintegration. The gamma rays are so energetic they rip atoms apart instead of again feeding the support of the star.
tl;dr: Yes, large stars are inefficient at fusing Hydrogen before they die. Non-Red Dwarfs only fuse elements in their cores, while Red Dwarfs who do burn efficiently haven’t died yet, so haven’t reached the end of their life.
​
Slightly longer answer: For a star to be “efficient” at using its Hydrogen, it will need to actually fuse it before the end of its life. Since the star will die once the core is unable to support its own weight by generating energy, this is a question on how the star replenishes its core, both by bringing in fresh Hydrogen, and by removing the Helium “ash”, the end result of fusion which does not generate energy and actually gets in the way of other Hydrogen atoms from fusing with each other.
Basically, you need to have some process which mixes the inner and outer layers of the star, ie convection. Convection happens when a hot blob of gas physically rises and cools off, before sinking back down again. This can only happen if the pressure gradient is low such that it can fall back down after cooling, or the temperature gradient is high enough such that there is something to cool down against.
Once you do the math, you arrive that Red Dwarves are fully convective, which allow the core to be refreshed with the outer layer’s hydrogen, and to spread the Helium ash around.
Medium sized stars (ex: the sun) are not fully convective, but instead have a convective outer layer, and inner layer the energy is transferred via radiation. The core doesn’t mix with the outer layers, so the Helium ash builds up in the core and the outer layers remain distinct and separate.
The most massive stars have a convective core, but energy is transferred via radiation in the outer envelope, which once again, results in only the core burning elements.
​
Once larger stars reach the end of their lives, they start to become hot enough that the Hydrogen fusion leaves the core region, and into the middle layers. This burning closer to the surface causes the outer layers to puff out from the increased temperature closer to the surface, while the inert Helium ash core continues to heat up until Helium fusion is triggered, ie Red Giant phase. The outer layers are now more loosely bound gravitationally speaking, so are also liable to get blown away via pressure driven solar winds. The interior pressure is basically blowing the gas clouds up, and they don’t come back down. For medium sized stars, this eventually leads to the outer layers just being blown away, as the Hydrogen burning front expands outward, and the outer layers get stripped away.
For massive stars, this is more determined by the core eventually attempting to burn iron (and failing because iron is the most tightly bound nucleon, and it can’t get the energy from burning wider and wider layers like earlier. Then it suddenly collapses into a neutron star or black hole, and the infalling gas rebounds off of the neutron star (or other infalling gas) produces the shockwave which blows out everything above it in the supernovae.
In a way, yes. Stars like our Sun are (thankfully) very “inefficient” at fusing hydrogen and can only manage it because of a quantum mechanical effect called quantum tunneling.
In order to fuse two hydrogen atoms together (the first step in the proton-proton fusion chain) the repulsive electrostatic force between the protons must be overcome in order for the short range, attractive strong force to take over and bind the protons to one another. In the core of our Sun (like most stars), where the temperatures and densities are highest, protons are constantly colliding into one another on the order of several billion times every second. However, none of these collisions have the energy required to overcome the electrostatic barrier. This is because the core of the Sun is “only” about 15 million Kelvin. To have an appreciable number of protons with the energy required to overcome the electrostatic barrier, the core of the Sun would need to be a few **billion** Kelvin. So, the core of our Sun is about 1000 times too cold to initiate fusion by directly overcoming the electrostatic barrier.
This is where quantum tunneling comes into play. Because of the probabilistic nature of quantum particles, the protons do not necessarily have to get over the electrostatic barrier because there is a non-zero probability that they can **go through it** (tunneling). For our Sun, at 15 million Kelvin, the probability of colliding protons tunneling through the electrostatic barrier is about 10^(-28). Or a 1 in 10 billion billion billion chance. So yes, very “inefficient”.
Luckily for stars, there are a lot of protons in the core of the Sun and each proton collides with another billions of times a second. So, the odds actually add up and the Sun can maintain a healthy level of fusion due to its sheer size and high density in the core.
Think of a closed box, set fire to the ingredients of the box, all the chemicals are reacted, now think of the alsame ingredients just laying on the floor, what ingredients are burned up the most? Same with the sun exploding, there is no box so the light stuff flies off before the stuff that could react before. Same principle with the sun, no box, so light stuff gets pushed over the reaction radius.
The rate of star formation currently in the universe is a lot lower than it was when stars first formed. Something like 90% of all the stars that will ever form have already formed too. So the Stars have fused a lot of hydrogen into heavier elements. Also, a lot of hydrogen has been gobbled up by black holes. And finally, a lot of hydrogen has been blown completely out of galaxies and into Intergalactic space where it might never form Stars again.
> it’s odd that there’s still enough hydrogen around
Most of the hydrogen was never part of a star. What stars do doesn’t matter to answer that part of the question.
Very few stars have enough mass to end in a supernova, by the way. These stars are pretty “inefficient”. Smaller stars, which are much more common, fuse more of their hydrogen.