#NAMBLA #Website #ChildSafety #OnlineSafety #InternetRegulation
Hey there! 🌟 It’s important to address your concern about NAMBLA having a website and why this organization is allowed to operate online. Let’s dive into the complex world of internet regulations and freedom of speech to shed light on this controversial topic. 🧐
Freedom of Speech vs. Harmful Content
While freedom of speech is a fundamental right, it becomes a delicate balance when it comes to allowing organizations like NAMBLA to have a platform, especially considering their controversial nature and potential harm to children. In the United States, websites are generally protected under the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech. As long as the content does not violate specific laws, websites, even those promoting controversial viewpoints, are often allowed to exist.
Internet Regulation Challenges
It’s important to note that regulating content on the internet is a challenging task. With the vast amount of information and diverse viewpoints available online, enforcing restrictions can be difficult. Additionally, different countries have various laws and regulations regarding online content, making it even more complex to regulate across borders.
Child Safety Concerns
The presence of websites like NAMBLA raises serious concerns about the safety of children online. While it may be legal for such organizations to have a website, their content and messages can pose a threat to minors. This highlights the need for heightened awareness of online safety and protection measures to safeguard children from harmful influences.
Addressing the Issue
To address the issue of websites promoting harmful or controversial content, it is crucial for authorities, internet service providers, and communities to work together to monitor and report concerning content. By staying vigilant and proactive, we can help mitigate the risks associated with such websites and protect vulnerable individuals from harm.
In conclusion, the allowance of NAMBLA to have a website highlights the complexities of balancing freedom of speech with the need for online safety, particularly concerning children. While regulations and enforcement mechanisms play a role in addressing harmful content, collaboration and awareness are key in safeguarding our online communities. Stay informed, stay safe, and let’s continue working towards a safer online environment for all! 💻🌐🔒
Speech isn’t illegal in the US, even if it’s things widely disagreed with.
There’s no authority that decides who gets to have a website worldwide. If something is illegal in the US they can host their website wherever in the world will allow it. Regardless it’s not illegal if they aren’t using the website to actually commit illegal acts. Talking about pedophilia, even advocating it isn’t illegal and that’s all they do on the site.
They aren’t doing anything illegal via their site, so presumably that’s why. I mean Scientology, PETA, the Vatican, they all have criminal activity on the part of their memberships but the websites remain online. Same difference.
Free speech, actions count but not words in most scenarios.
Years ago we were brainstorming a website and company name for my wife’s new business and thought to use her initials and business service as a short web address. We looked up that combination and found a website that was NAMBLA adjacent and were horrified that such an open website existed. Naturally, we decided to go in a completely different direction on her business name and website.
The First Amendment doesn’t just protect your speech, it protects theirs too. (They even have a lobbyist, if you can believe that.)
Free speech has to be absolute or there’s no point. No matter how obvious it seems to us that a certain idea shouldn’t be allowed, once we cross that line, it **will** eventually be expanded and abused to include virtually anything the government doesn’t like.
Hey man what your problem with Marlon Brando look-alikes?
I had to look up what that acronym stands for and now I’m probably on a list. Thanks.
Diddy got their back…
“I got curious”
It has begun.
The First Amendment allows people to talk about whatever they want to talk about. Speech is only illegal when it causes harm, panic, etc.
As an example the old shout fire in a movie theater. If no one panics and everyone ignores you, it’s not illegal.
NAMBLA, KKK, Nazis etc can all talk about their beliefs, hold meetings, have websites etc. Until they cross the line to where that speech leads to or likely will lead to harm.
NAMBLA used to hold its meetings in the public library in San Francisco. They’re out there.
[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-01-17-mn-65-story.html](https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-01-17-mn-65-story.html)
Bruh if you go to that website, 10/10 you are going to get your IP flagged.
Remember….pedophiles or minor attracted people aren’t people.. 😊
Why haven’t Epstein’s client’s been jailed yet?
Why do hundreds of thousands of foster kids get trafficked every year?
Because having a website isn’t illegal and their money spends just as well as anyone else’s.
Free speech. As long as they don’t have child porn on the website or abet child abuse, there is no crime.
Marlon was a great actor and we look alikes shouldn’t be discriminated against
Sick Sick Sick
The North American Marlon Brando Look Alikes, deserve their own website….
I think as long as they don’t encourage or elude acting on anything, they’re free to say whatever. And yeah you’re probably on a server now